The marrying of Evidence-based medicine and Experience-based medicine.
Have you ever sat in a Dr’s surgery, told the Dr everything about your signs and symptoms, and then you hear those fated word:
“WELL IN MY EXPERIENCE”
Many years ago, we trusted Dr’s to use their experience to know what was wrong with us. These days, we can now have blood tests, scans, x-rays and more, to back up that experience.
Some Dr’s are single (they only use Evidence, or they only use Experience. Some Dr’s have successfully married the two. Others are in a relationship, but is very shaky and they have to work hard to keep the relationship on an even keel.
If your Dr is a “in my experience” type Dr you need to remind them that actually Doc, it’s not just about your experience, it’s also about your skills to interpret results of blood tests, scans, images, or any other investigation, to build a full picture. Its about your ability to keep an open mind, your realisation that not every blocked nose is a cold, that every high BP is from poor diet and lack of exercise.
You might have had Jane Doe in here with a blocked nose that was hay fever last week. But I don’t get hay fever, my nose is not normally blocked like this, and it is giving me a major headache.
If ever a Dr says to you “Well in my experience” and they have never met you before, then there experience could mean diddlysquat, if it not balanced with correct interpretation from clinical investigations, blood tests, x-rays, scans, or what ever else needs to be done before a confirmed diagnosis is made..
Dr’s must learn to park their experience at the door when they first come into the room to see a new patient because their experience, however vast, can mean a missed diagnosis, a wrong presumption, the brushing aside of what appears a “minor abnormality” which can be a major cause, or the vital clue to the true condition.
Let me give you an example.
As those who have read my blog know, my husband Derek has Antiphospholipid Syndrome. It means his blood is more susceptible to clotting. To prevent this happening he takes Warfarin.
In May 2012 the Dr’s stopped his warfarin for 5 days without any anticoagulation cover. We, at this time, trusted Dr’s to know what they were doing.
The day of the biopsy he felt “unwell”, the day after his biopsy he was seriously sick.
Enter the Presumptive Dr. Experience based diagnosis and treatment began. In the experience of all the Drs we dealt with, on balance of presumption, he had Sepsis.
Immediately treating that sepsis was the right option. However, they still had to make sure it was sepsis, not just use their experience and accept it.
After giving the high dose anitbiotics, what they did was ignore the facts as presented. When we spoke to each Dr we told them:
- Derek had not had warfarin for 5 days (and was still not taking it)
- Derek had a blood clotting disorder which, without warfarin, meant he had a high risk of clotting
- He felt unwell at the time of the biopsy
The Evidence Based Medicine did not support a diagnosis of sepsis, especially when you add the signs and symptoms together. The clinical evidence showed no sign of infection based on a number of blood tests. The blood tests only showed his body was fighting inflammation which is a classic sigh of an APS flair, or CAPS. They could not identify any bacteria or any of the many signs, only an indication of inflammation.
Yet because sepsis was the obvious diagnosis based on experience, no other investigation even was done when the evidence didn’t support it. It was put down to just one of those things.
In Sept 2012 the same thing happened. Between 2 and 16 Oct we visited many Drs, telling them all the same story. He had stopped warfarin for 5 days, then had prostate surgery, and had been unwell the entire time.
All that was heard was Warfarin and prostate surgery. Clearly he had some form of infection, firstly a UTI, then a reaction to antibiotics, then a throat infection, another reaction to medication, a kidney infection……. Infection, infection, infection. Never did he have a blood test. All the diagnoses were experience based presumptions, without evidence. 2 tests were done during the week, one throat swab and one swab of a rash. Both these came back clear. No one listened to the real symptoms and none of the Dr’s put all the symptoms together. Just because there was symptoms 1 yesterday, didn’t mean it should be ignore when symptom 2 happened. In the 2 weeks from 2 to 16 October, Derek only had 1 blood test. Nobody queried his history of cessation of warfarin and the history of blood clots. We told of a history of his INR going high above range, then a bleeding event in the previous 2 weeks. All were ignored because those we spoke to had no experience with those, so they couldn’t comment.
This is where experience based medication falls down. To use experience, the Dr must first have experience. Because it was rare, they did not.
On 16 Oct Derek was finally admitted to hospital He had had blood tests on the Friday which when finally looked at 4 days later, and were all way out of range.
He was rushed to hospital via ambulance, but still his own Dr, knowing his history, told the Ambulance officers that it was suspected sepsis.
On the morning of 17 Oct he had a CT.
This CT showed a small pocket of pneumonia and an accumulation of fluid around the lungs.
What was also mentioned on the CT report was what “has the appearance of a clot, and the left adrenal gland appears enlarged”.
These two findings were ignored as insignificant compared to the fluid around the lungs, and the presumption that he again had Sepsis.
For 6 days they ignored the history of APS, cessation of warfarin, and the findings on the CT and instead treated him (unsuccessfully) for sepsis. No matter the treatment, his body continued shutting down.
It wasn’t until a junior Dr visited Derek. Having left all presumptions at the door, she started from scratch. She asked questions, studied his body, all the time taking note. She then went and read the reports. Including the report from 17 Oct. It was only then, because a Dr threw all presumptions of the previous 2 weeks, out the window, that the true catastrophe revealed itself.
I am not saying that immediate treatment for sepsis wasn’t a good idea, but when they didn’t find any evidence of it, then they should have kept looking.
Yes, treat the easiest condition first, but consider other options, including, if all else proves negative, that zebra hiding in the dark corner.
“In my experience”
If the Dr says this to you and you have never met him/her before, point out that any experience they had before facing you, although useful, needs to be successfully married to evidence, and they need to have experience of using that evidence.
What you are looking for from them is their training and knowledge in interpreting investigations, with an open mind to the possibility that they have never experienced YOUR particular circumstances before.
Experience is great once they know what is wrong, but making a presumption based more on their experience than on fact, can leave many people remaining undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, untreated or feeling sicker than before. When it happens time and time again, some patients just feel like giving up.
It can be hard to be taken seriously when you have to go from Dr to Dr because you KNOW there is something wrong, and all you get is Presumptive diagnoses, the treatment for which, is clearly not working.
It is hard to advocate for yourself, but if you are able to, when the Dr seems to be diagnosing you based on HIS/HER experience, not yours, ask them what they are basing their diagnosis on. Get them to explain how they came to that decision. Ask what evidence they have.
It can be hard, but if asked in the right way, and if necessary asking the same question in several different ways, it can make the Dr rethink their own ideas. Sometimes however, the Experience and the Evidence are divorced. They will never live happily together with the Dr, and at this time, you need to find another Dr.